- Home /
- The Open Group /
- TOGAF Certifications /
- OGEA-102 Dumps
Reasons to Choose Our The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam Dumps
The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam Dumps - Curated by Subject Matter Experts
Are you tired of getting The Open Group OGEA-102 dumps with wrong answers? Don’t worry now because our TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam dumps are curated by subject matter experts ensuring every question has the right answer
Prepare Your Exam with The Open Group OGEA-102 Dumps on Any Device
We facilitate you by offering our The Open Group OGEA-102 exam dumps in three different formats (PDF file, Offline, and Online Practice Test Software)
Self-Assess Your TOGAF Certifications Exam Preparation
Self-Assess Your The Open Group OGEA-102 exam preparation with our OGEA-102 dumps enriched with various features such as time limit, personalized result page, etc
Eliminate Risk of Failure with The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam Dumps
Schedule your time wisely to provide yourself sufficient time each day to prepare for the The Open Group OGEA-102 exam. Make time each day to study in a quiet place, as you'll need to thoroughly cover the material for the TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam . Our actual TOGAF Certifications exam dumps help you in your preparation. Prepare for the The Open Group OGEA-102 exam with our OGEA-102 dumps every day if you want to succeed on your first try.
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of a consultant to the Lead Enterprise Architect in a multinational automotive manufacturer.
The company has a corporate strategy that focuses on electrification of its portfolio, and it has invested
heavily in a new shared car platform to use across all its brands. The company has four manufacturing
facilities, one in North America, two in Europe, and one in Asia.
A challenge that the company is facing is to scale up the number of vehicles coming off the production line to meet customer demand, while maintaining quality. There are significant supply chain shortages for electronic components, which are impacting production. In response to this the company has taken on new suppliers and has also taken design and production of the battery pack in-house.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice. The TOGAF standard is used for developing
the process and systems used to design, manufacture, and test the battery pack. The Chief Information
Officer and the Chief Operating Officer co-sponsor the Enterprise Architecture program.
As part of putting the new battery pack into production, adjustments to the assembly processes need to be made. A pilot project has been completed at a single location. The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the activity, and the Architecture Board have approved the plan for implementation and migration at each plant.
Draft Architecture Contracts have been developed that detail the work needed to implement and deploy the new processes for each location. The company mixes internal teams with a few third-party contractors at the locations. The Chief Engineer has expressed concern that the deployment will not be consistent and of acceptable quality.
Refer to the scenario
The Lead Enterprise Architect has asked you to review the draft Architecture Contracts and recommend the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?
See the explanation below.
In the scenario, the Lead Enterprise Architect has asked you to review the draft Architecture Contracts and recommend the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern about the consistency and quality of the deployment of the new processes for the battery pack production at each location.
The other options are not correct because they either23:
A) For changes requested by an internal team, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. For contracts issued to third-party contractors, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.: This option does not address the need to review the contracts to ensure that they address the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. It also does not recommend a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process. Moreover, it suggests that a memorandum of understanding is sufficient for internal teams, which may not be legally binding or enforceable.
B) For changes undertaken by internal teams, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. If a contract is issued to a contractor, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. If a deviation from the Architecture Contract is found, you recommend that the Architecture Board grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.: This option has the same problems as option A, and also implies that the Architecture Board should always grant a dispensation for any deviation, which may not be appropriate or desirable in some cases.
D) You recommend that the Architecture Contracts be used to manage the architecture governance processes across the locations. You recommend deployment of monitoring tools to assess the performance of each completed battery pack at each location and develop change requirements if necessary. If a deviation from the contract is detected, the Architecture Board should allow the Architecture Contract to be modified meet the local needs. In such cases they should issue a new Request for Architecture Work.: This option does not address the need to review the contracts to ensure that they address the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. It also does not recommend a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process. Moreover, it suggests that the Architecture Board should always allow the Architecture Contract to be modified for any deviation, which may not be appropriate or desirable in some cases. It also implies that a new Request for Architecture Work should be issued for each deviation, which may not be necessary or feasible.
References:
2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Chapter 43: Architecture Contracts
3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Chapter 44: Architecture Governance
Are You Looking for More Updated and Actual The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam Questions?
If you want a more premium set of actual The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam Questions then you can get them at the most affordable price. Premium TOGAF Certifications exam questions are based on the official syllabus of the The Open Group OGEA-102 exam. They also have a high probability of coming up in the actual TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam .
You will also get free updates for 90 days with our premium The Open Group OGEA-102 exam. If there is a change in the syllabus of The Open Group OGEA-102 exam our subject matter experts always update it accordingly.