Linux Foundation CKS PDF Exam Questions:

Name: CKS PDF
Brand: ExamsKit
Price: 59.00 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.7 (312 reviews)

How to Get Success in Linux Foundation CKS Exam:

Avoid deceptive CKS PDF Exam Questions.
Focus on CKS Questions (PDF) based on the latest exam syllabus.
Make notes of Linux Foundation CKS PDF for better learning.
Prepare from our latest Linux Foundation CKS PDF file and get success in first attempt.

Prepare Linux Foundation CKS Exam Within Short Time

Your knowledge and abilities are validated by passing the Linux Foundation CKS exam. Our PDF questions and answers will help you prepare for the CKS exam in a short time because it includes questions similar to the real Linux Foundation exam questions. After downloading the CKS Linux Foundation PDF exam questions, relevant to the actual exam, you can take a print of all questions and prepare them anytime, anywhere.

Realistic Scenario Based Linux Foundation CKS PDF Exam Questions:

Everyone wants to become certified Kubernetes Security Specialist and improve his/her resume. You should practice with real CKS questions. Students can benefit from the CKS exam questions which are available in PDF format. The CKS exam questions and answers are designed to match the criteria of the actual exam. If you use scenario-based Linux Foundation CKS questions you will have an extra potential to clear the exam on the first attempt.

Q1.

Create a new ServiceAccount named backend-sa in the existing namespace default, which has the capability to list the pods inside the namespace default.

Create a new Pod named backend-pod in the namespace default, mount the newly created sa backend-sa to the pod, and Verify that the pod is able to list pods.

Ensure that the Pod is running.

AExplanation:
A service account provides an identity for processes that run in a Pod.
When you (a human) access the cluster (for example, usingkubectl), you are authenticated by the apiserver as a particular User Account (currently this is usuallyadmin, unless your cluster administrator has customized your cluster). Processes in containers inside pods can also contact the apiserver. When they do, they are authenticated as a particular Service Account (for example,default).
When you create a pod, if you do not specify a service account, it is automatically assigned thedefaultservice account in the same namespace. If you get the raw json or yaml for a pod you have created (for example,kubectl get pods/ -o yaml), you can see thespec.serviceAccountNamefield has beenautomatically set.
You can access the API from inside a pod using automatically mounted service account credentials, as described inAccessing the Cluster. The API permissions of the service account depend on theauthorization plugin and policyin use.
In version 1.6+, you can opt out of automounting API credentials for a service account by settingautomountServiceAccountToken: falseon the service account:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: build-robot
automountServiceAccountToken: false
...
In version 1.6+, you can also opt out of automounting API credentials for a particular pod:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: my-pod
spec:
serviceAccountName: build-robot
automountServiceAccountToken: false
...
The pod spec takes precedence over the service account if both specify aautomountServiceAccountTokenvalue.

Answer: A

Q2.

Fix all issues via configuration and restart the affected components to ensure the new setting takes effect.

Fix all of the following violations that were found against theAPI server:-

a. Ensure the --authorization-mode argument includes RBAC

b. Ensure the --authorization-mode argument includes Node

c. Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false

Fix all of the following violations that were found against theKubelet:-

a. Ensure the --anonymous-auth argument is set to false.

b. Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is set to Webhook.

Fix all of the following violations that were found against theETCD:-

a. Ensure that the --auto-tls argument is not set to true

Hint: Take the use of Tool Kube-Bench

AExplanation:
API server:
Ensure the --authorization-mode argument includes RBAC
Turn on Role Based Access Control.
Role Based Access Control (RBAC) allows fine-grained control over the operations that different entities can perform on different objects in the cluster. It is recommended to use the RBAC authorization mode.
Fix - Buildtime
Kubernetes
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
component: kube-apiserver
tier: control-plane
name: kube-apiserver
namespace: kube-system
spec:
containers:
- command:
+ - kube-apiserver
+ - --authorization-mode=RBAC,Node
image: gcr.io/google_containers/kube-apiserver-amd64:v1.6.0
livenessProbe:
failureThreshold: 8
httpGet:
host: 127.0.0.1
path: /healthz
port: 6443
scheme: HTTPS
initialDelaySeconds: 15
timeoutSeconds: 15
name: kube-apiserver-should-pass
resources:
requests:
cpu: 250m
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /etc/kubernetes/
name: k8s
readOnly: true
- mountPath: /etc/ssl/certs
name: certs
- mountPath: /etc/pki
name: pki
hostNetwork: true
volumes:
- hostPath:
path: /etc/kubernetes
name: k8s
- hostPath:
path: /etc/ssl/certs
name: certs
- hostPath:
path: /etc/pki
name: pki
Ensure the --authorization-mode argument includes Node
Remediation:Edit the API server pod specification file/etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yamlon the master node and set the--authorization-modeparameter to a value that includesNode.
--authorization-mode=Node,RBAC
Audit:
/bin/ps -ef | grep kube-apiserver | grep -v grep
Expected result:
'Node,RBAC' has 'Node'
Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false
Remediation:Edit the API server pod specification file/etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yamlon the master node and set the below parameter.
--profiling=false
Audit:
/bin/ps -ef | grep kube-apiserver | grep -v grep
Expected result:
'false' is equal to 'false'
Fix all of the following violations that were found against theKubelet:-
Ensure the --anonymous-auth argument is set to false.
Remediation:If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set authentication:anonymous: enabled tofalse. If using executable arguments, edit the kubelet service file/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.confon each worker node and set the below parameter inKUBELET_SYSTEM_PODS_ARGSvariable.
--anonymous-auth=false
Based on your system, restart the kubelet service. For example:
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Audit:
/bin/ps -fC kubelet
Audit Config:
/bin/cat /var/lib/kubelet/config.yaml
Expected result:
'false' is equal to 'false'
2) Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is set to Webhook.
Audit
docker inspect kubelet | jq -e '.[0].Args[] | match('--authorization-mode=Webhook').string'
Returned Value:--authorization-mode=Webhook
Fix all of the following violations that were found against theETCD:-
a. Ensure that the --auto-tls argument is not set to true
Do not use self-signed certificates for TLS. etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should not be available to unauthenticated clients. You should enable the client authentication via valid certificates to secure the access to the etcd service.
Fix - Buildtime
Kubernetes
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
annotations:
scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/critical-pod: ''
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
component: etcd
tier: control-plane
name: etcd
namespace: kube-system
spec:
containers:
- command:
+ - etcd
+ - --auto-tls=true
image: k8s.gcr.io/etcd-amd64:3.2.18
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
livenessProbe:
exec:
command:
- /bin/sh
- -ec
- ETCDCTL_API=3 etcdctl --endpoints=https://[192.168.22.9]:2379 --cacert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt
--cert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/healthcheck-client.crt --key=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/healthcheck-client.key
get foo
failureThreshold: 8
initialDelaySeconds: 15
timeoutSeconds: 15
name: etcd-should-fail
resources: {}
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /var/lib/etcd
name: etcd-data
- mountPath: /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd
name: etcd-certs
hostNetwork: true
priorityClassName: system-cluster-critical
volumes:
- hostPath:
path: /var/lib/etcd
type: DirectoryOrCreate
name: etcd-data
- hostPath:
path: /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd
type: DirectoryOrCreate
name: etcd-certs
status: {}

Answer: A

See the explanation below.

Q3.

Create a PSP that will prevent the creation of privileged pods in the namespace.

Create a new PodSecurityPolicy named prevent-privileged-policy which prevents the creation of privileged pods.

Create a new ServiceAccount named psp-sa in the namespace default.

Create a new ClusterRole named prevent-role, which uses the newly created Pod Security Policy prevent-privileged-policy.

Create a new ClusterRoleBinding named prevent-role-binding, which binds the created ClusterRole prevent-role to the created SA psp-sa.

Also, Check the Configuration is working or not by trying to Create a Privileged pod, it should get failed.

AExplanation:
Create a PSP that will prevent the creation of privileged pods in the namespace.
$ cat clusterrole-use-privileged.yaml
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: use-privileged-psp
rules:
- apiGroups: ['policy']
resources: ['podsecuritypolicies']
verbs: ['use']
resourceNames:
- default-psp
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: privileged-role-bind
namespace: psp-test
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: use-privileged-psp
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: privileged-sa
$ kubectl -n psp-test apply -f clusterrole-use-privileged.yaml
After a few moments, the privileged Pod should be created.
Create a new PodSecurityPolicy named prevent-privileged-policy which prevents the creation of privileged pods.
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: example
spec:
privileged: false # Don't allow privileged pods!
# The rest fills in some required fields.
seLinux:
rule: RunAsAny
supplementalGroups:
rule: RunAsAny
runAsUser:
rule: RunAsAny
fsGroup:
rule: RunAsAny
volumes:
- '*'
And create it with kubectl:
kubectl-admin create -f example-psp.yaml
Now, as the unprivileged user, try to create a simple pod:
kubectl-user create -f- <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: pause
spec:
containers:
- name: pause
image: k8s.gcr.io/pause
EOF
The output is similar to this:
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating 'STDIN': pods 'pause' is forbidden: unable to validate against any pod security policy: []
Create a new ServiceAccount named psp-sa in the namespace default.
$ cat clusterrole-use-privileged.yaml
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: use-privileged-psp
rules:
- apiGroups: ['policy']
resources: ['podsecuritypolicies']
verbs: ['use']
resourceNames:
- default-psp
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: privileged-role-bind
namespace: psp-test
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: use-privileged-psp
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: privileged-sa
$ kubectl -n psp-test apply -f clusterrole-use-privileged.yaml
After a few moments, the privileged Pod should be created.
Create a new ClusterRole named prevent-role, which uses the newly created Pod Security Policy prevent-privileged-policy.
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: example
spec:
privileged: false # Don't allow privileged pods!
# The rest fills in some required fields.
seLinux:
rule: RunAsAny
supplementalGroups:
rule: RunAsAny
runAsUser:
rule: RunAsAny
fsGroup:
rule: RunAsAny
volumes:
- '*'
And create it with kubectl:
kubectl-admin create -f example-psp.yaml
Now, as the unprivileged user, try to create a simple pod:
kubectl-user create -f- <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: pause
spec:
containers:
- name: pause
image: k8s.gcr.io/pause
EOF
The output is similar to this:
Error from server (Forbidden): error when creating 'STDIN': pods 'pause' is forbidden: unable to validate against any pod security policy: []
Create a new ClusterRoleBinding named prevent-role-binding, which binds the created ClusterRole prevent-role to the created SA psp-sa.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
# This role binding allows 'jane' to read pods in the 'default' namespace.
# You need to already have a Role named 'pod-reader' in that namespace.
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: read-pods
namespace: default
subjects:
# You can specify more than one 'subject'
- kind: User
name: jane # 'name' is case sensitive
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
roleRef:
# 'roleRef' specifies the binding to a Role / ClusterRole
kind: Role #this must be Role or ClusterRole
name: pod-reader # this must match the name of the Role or ClusterRole you wish to bind to
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
namespace: default
name: pod-reader
rules:
- apiGroups: [''] # '' indicates the core API group
resources: ['pods']
verbs: ['get', 'watch', 'list']

Answer: A

Q4.

Context

A Role bound to a Pod's ServiceAccount grants overly permissive permissions. Complete the following tasks to reduce the set of permissions.

Task

Given an existing Pod named web-pod running in the namespace security.

Edit the existing Role bound to the Pod's ServiceAccount sa-dev-1 to only allow performing watch operations, only on resources of type services.

Create a new Role named role-2 in the namespace security, which only allows performing update

operations, only on resources of type namespaces.

Create a new RoleBinding named role-2-binding binding the newly created Role to the Pod's ServiceAccount.

q4_CKS

AExplanation:

Answer: A

Q5.

Enable audit logs in the cluster, To Do so, enable the log backend, and ensure that

1. logs are stored at /var/log/kubernetes-logs.txt.

2. Log files are retained for 12 days.

3. at maximum, a number of 8 old audit logs files are retained.

4. set the maximum size before getting rotated to 200MB

Edit and extend the basic policy to log:

1. namespaces changes at RequestResponse

2. Log the request body of secrets changes in the namespace kube-system.

3. Log all other resources in core and extensions at the Request level.

4. Log "pods/portforward", "services/proxy" at Metadata level.

5. Omit the Stage RequestReceived

All other requests at the Metadata level

AExplanation:
Kubernetes auditing provides a security-relevant chronological set of records about a cluster. Kube-apiserver performs auditing. Each request on each stage of its execution generates an event, which is then pre-processed according to a certain policy and written to a backend. The policy determines what's recorded and the backends persist the records.
You might want to configure the audit log as part of compliance with the CIS (Center for Internet Security) Kubernetes Benchmark controls.
The audit log can be enabled by default using the following configuration incluster.yml:
services:
kube-api:
audit_log:
enabled: true
When the audit log is enabled, you should be able to see the default values at/etc/kubernetes/audit-policy.yaml
The log backend writes audit events to a file inJSONlinesformat. You can configure the log audit backend using the followingkube-apiserverflags:
--audit-log-pathspecifies the log file path that log backend uses to write audit events. Not specifying this flag disables log backend.-means standard out
--audit-log-maxagedefined the maximum number of days to retain old audit log files
--audit-log-maxbackupdefines the maximum number of audit log files to retain
--audit-log-maxsizedefines the maximum size in megabytes of the audit log file before it gets rotated
If your cluster's control plane runs the kube-apiserver as a Pod, remember to mount thehostPathto the location of the policy file and log file, so that audit records are persisted. For example:
--audit-policy-file=/etc/kubernetes/audit-policy.yaml \
--audit-log-path=/var/log/audit.log

Answer: A

Linux Foundation CKS Exam Candidates Are also Interested In:

Linux Foundation Kubernetes,

How To Get Sample Questions And Answers For Linux Foundation CKS Exam ?,

Certified Kubernetes Security Specialist Mock Test,

Linux Foundation Kubernetes Security Specialist Exam Dumps,

Reliable Source Of Preparation For Certified Kubernetes Security Specialist Exam.

We provide Kubernetes Security Specialist certification questions along with answers to assist students in passing the Linux Foundation Exam. You can enhance your Linux Foundation CKS preparation with the help of an online practice engine. Try out our Linux Foundation CKS questions because 98% of Examskit users passed the final CKS exam in one go.

GET CKS EXAM PREMIUM ACCESS